Re: potential discussion topic from Re: proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments''

On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 13:20, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> There is one change that needs either work or discussion, namely
> 
> > Section 3.4
> > Unnamed ontologies: informally, multiple Annontations on an unnamed
> > ontology don't need to be satisfied by the same "x" according to this
> > table. Don't think that's right.
> 
> Correct.  It is not right.  Fixing it will require some surgery to Section
> 3.4.  This may need further discussion in the working group.
> 
> but this response explicitly excludes this one comment.

Ah; yes. right.

> peter
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 14:27:50 UTC