- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 16:06:44 -0400 (EDT)
- To: hendler@cs.umd.edu
- Cc: schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu> Subject: Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:54:28 -0400 > At 3:37 PM -0400 5/29/03, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >I don't see anything in what Guus quotes to indicate that there has been a > >decision on whether owl:sameAs is in OWL DL. > > > >peter > > > WG decided that owl:sameAs is a synonym for owl:sameIndividualAs (issue 4.6) > owl:sameIndividualAs is in OWL Lite > (http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/syntax.html#2.2) > > I therefore read our record (based on a simple syllogism) as placing > owl:sameAs in Lite. I disagree that this follows. > Both chairs now agree that the WG did indeed decide owl:sameAs is in DL/Lite. > > Could one of the editors of S&AS please make the change, or offer > new evidence that the chairs should reconsider the decision > thanks > JH peter
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2003 16:06:59 UTC