- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 16:28:10 +0200
- To: "Jeremy Carroll <jjc" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
An experience that we implemented is that we create a _:x rdf:type rdf:List. triple when we load a _:x rdf:rest _:y. triple. -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com> To: www-webont-wg@w3.org Sent by: cc: www-webont-wg-requ Subject: rdf:List est@w3.org 2003-05-02 10:08 PM The RDF Core group is discussing a late last call comment from a developer which proposes that triples of the form _:x rdf:type rdf:List . should not be produced by the rdf:parseType="Collection" construct, but that it should only produce rdf:first and rdf:rest triples. [1][2] I and Dave Beckett have opposed, on the grounds this construct was put in for OWL, (based on daml:collection) and this is what webont asked for. Peter, at my invitation, has indicated he would oppose this change. [3] However, RDF Core is deadlocked, so I have indicated that I am willing to shift my oppose to an abstain if I do not get strong support from WebOnt before the next RDF Core meeting (Friday 9th). Comments? Jeremy [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#timbl-03 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0586.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0273.html
Received on Sunday, 4 May 2003 10:28:25 UTC