- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 16:28:10 +0200
- To: "Jeremy Carroll <jjc" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
An experience that we implemented is that we create a
_:x rdf:type rdf:List.
triple when we load a
_:x rdf:rest _:y.
triple.
-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Jeremy Carroll
<jjc@hpl.hp.com> To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Sent by: cc:
www-webont-wg-requ Subject: rdf:List
est@w3.org
2003-05-02 10:08
PM
The RDF Core group is discussing a late last call comment from a developer
which proposes that triples of the form
_:x rdf:type rdf:List .
should not be produced by the
rdf:parseType="Collection"
construct, but that it should only produce rdf:first and rdf:rest triples.
[1][2]
I and Dave Beckett have opposed, on the grounds this construct was put in
for
OWL, (based on daml:collection) and this is what webont asked for.
Peter, at my invitation, has indicated he would oppose this change. [3]
However, RDF Core is deadlocked, so I have indicated that I am willing to
shift my oppose to an abstain if I do not get strong support from WebOnt
before the next RDF Core meeting (Friday 9th).
Comments?
Jeremy
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#timbl-03
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0586.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0273.html
Received on Sunday, 4 May 2003 10:28:25 UTC