Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29

From: Sandro Hawke <>
Subject: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:20:54 -0400


> G) OntologyProperty
>        Two options here: fix a bug in OntologyProperty or just remove
>        it entirely.  Is it a useful subProperty of AnnotationProperty?
>        RESOLVED WITHOUT OBJECTION (Connolly and Hayes abstaining): do
>        349(G) "peter and I [Jeremy] propose that we add an
>        ontologyproperty directive which mirrors the annotationproperty
>        directive in the abstract syntax, with appropriate mapping
>        rules."

I have made the appropriate changes to S&AS to support this.  Changes
should probably be made to Reference as well.  I don't think that Overview
of Guide need to be changed as there is really very little reason to use
other ontology properties.


Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 12:13:07 UTC