- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 14 May 2003 10:15:06 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 03:40, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Guus, Jim > > I am hoping that we will be able to move to a Last Call vote on Test tomorrow. > > I will provide an updated version later today including changes from the > review comments. > > I believe that before the vote we should consider the following: > > 1) approving more tests that Ian can now execute > I will send a formal proposal message > > 2) a double-check that what I have written about datatypes is what we want > I will send a summary after I have explicit text to vote on. 2.5) let's take out the "complete OWL DL consistency checker" conformance clause. More formally, for tomorrow's agenda: On the basis of the new information from this review comment Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 15:18:27 +0100 Subject: OWL Comment: have long CR period for OWL, or move owl:oneOf, owl:haveValue to OWL Full http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0046.html I propose to reconsider our decision of 10 January: RESOLVED: that the OWL test document shall specify conformance of consistency checkers {Lite, DL, Full} x {Incomplete, Complete}. -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf5.html#Test I think maybe that record is buggy; we knew in January that we weren't shooting for a "complete full consistency checker" sticker. But more to the point: it's not clear to me that there's a market for a "complete OWL DL consistency checker" either. And the main reason for a conformance clause/sticker is to catalyze a market segment. So let's take it out of the test spec before we go to last call. > 3) a quick run through of the most significant changes from this week review > (and most significant review comments that I did not accept) > > If (2) or (3) fails we may need to not have the vote; or they may result in > minor editorial actions prior to publication. (1) would result in an > editorial action prior to publication. > > Jeremy > > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 11:17:00 UTC