- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 14:09:56 +0200
- To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Pat, in your message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0067.html you wrote very sensible comments which I fully support. If I may suggest, put on your OWL S&AS editor's hat and put it those changes !-) Further on, as I have suggested many times, the OWL Full vocabulary extension of the RDFS semantics [RDFS MT] could be made explicit in the shape of corresponding entailment or inference rules which are sanctioned by those OWL Full semantics. What I captured from many people in the community is that they are really interested in that and that it would drastically increase interoperability between OWL Full reasoners, verifiers and explainers. I also believe that this is a realistic job; even achieving a minimum set is much better than having nothing ;-) -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2003 08:10:10 UTC