Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide)

On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 03:31, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> The HP team report that we have had difficulty working on owl:sameAs 
> because different team members are working from different documents.
> S&AS excludes owl:sameAs from OWL DL and OWL Lite.
> Guide recommends not using owl:sameAs (ever), but states that it is 
> synonomous with owl:sameIndividualAs, and suggests that using owl:sameAs 
> between classes is in full.
> Ref is more positive about owl:sameAs.
> It would be helpful if the story were clearer, in particular Ref and Guide 
> should say that all uses of owl:sameAs are in Full (personally, I would not 
> mind simply dropping owl:sameAs).

I'd prefer to have just one; let's call it sameAs though.

> Jeremy
Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 15:20:14 UTC