RE: complete checkers should or MUST pass tests from Jeremy Carroll on 2003-05-12 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from May 2003)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 18:59:07 +0200
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: "WebOnt WG" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDGEKHCBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

A third possibility would be "SHOULD" instead of "should" past tests - as a
sort of compromise.

It may mean that our work fits better with other recommendations etc that
assume that it is sufficiently clear what an OWL implementation is intended
to do.

Jeremy

Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 12:59:22 UTC