- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:38:22 +0100
- To: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Sean Bechhofer wrote: > > In the process of documenting my implementations, I have produced the > following: > > http://wonderweb.man.ac.uk/owl/rdf.shtml I glanced at this and thought it was pretty good, distinctly more readable than the stuff I produce. There were one or two technical mistakes, I can give a detailed review if the group wants (e.g. owl:equivalentClass inadequately handled). We perhaps need to have consensus on which technical changes we are making to OWL, since they tend to show up in this sort of document. I think with this appraoch we are unlikely to get everything 100% spot on, so it would be good to have this in a document either which is updatable or with an errata page so we can fix it into the future. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2003 05:39:01 UTC