W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003


From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:38:22 +0100
Message-ID: <3ED5D50E.7050904@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: www-webont-wg@w3.org

Sean Bechhofer wrote:

> In the process of documenting my implementations, I have produced the
> following:
> http://wonderweb.man.ac.uk/owl/rdf.shtml

I glanced at this and thought it was pretty good, distinctly more readable 
than the stuff I produce. There were one or two technical mistakes, I can 
give a detailed review if the group wants (e.g. owl:equivalentClass 
inadequately handled).

We perhaps need to have consensus on which technical changes we are making 
to OWL, since they tend to show up in this sort of document.

I think with this appraoch we are unlikely to get everything 100% spot on, 
so it would be good to have this in a document either which is updatable or 
with an errata page so we can fix it into the future.

Received on Thursday, 29 May 2003 05:39:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:45 UTC