- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:57:43 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > Sean Bechhofer wrote: > > > > > In the process of documenting my implementations, I have produced the > > following: > > > > http://wonderweb.man.ac.uk/owl/rdf.shtml > > > I glanced at this and thought it was pretty good, distinctly more readable > than the stuff I produce. There were one or two technical mistakes, I can > give a detailed review if the group wants (e.g. owl:equivalentClass > inadequately handled). This would certainly be useful for me. > We perhaps need to have consensus on which technical changes we are making > to OWL, since they tend to show up in this sort of document. > > I think with this appraoch we are unlikely to get everything 100% spot on, > so it would be good to have this in a document either which is updatable or > with an errata page so we can fix it into the future. Indeed. Sean -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2003 06:58:33 UTC