- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 21:12:20 +0300
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Stilll replying to Pat http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0166.html > The English gloss on some of the tests (eg > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/byFunction#function-FunctionalProperty > refers to 'arcs', which is a term that is now deprecated by the RDF > WG. Might this be better phrased? Example: OLD text: > If prop belongs to owl:FunctionalProperty , and subject denotes a > resource and has two outgoing prop arcs, then the object s of these > arcs have the same denotation. Hence an arc originating in object1 > can be copied to object2 . NEW text: > If prop belongs to owl:FunctionalProperty , and subject denotes a > resource which is the subject of two prop triples, then the object s > of these triples have the same denotation. Hence any assertion made > using one of them can be transferred to the other. Accepted. > In general, perform substitutions > 'has FOO incoming prop arc' /'is the object of FOO prop triples' > 'has FOO outgoing prop arc' /'is the subject of FOO prop triples' accepted > No other complaints. Full marks on layout, overall document > structure, etc., and extra credit for C.5.1 :-) Ta I've now replied to the comment in all (spread over three e-mails, sorry). Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 15:12:11 UTC