- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:15:47 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
At 10:58 PM +0300 5/14/03, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >I believe that as we enter the last call comment review period on the other >docs it is inevitable that we will have open issues. >It is unfortunate that test was behind the other docs, but it was; and given >that, the test editors can only make best efforts at hitting a moving target >until our issue list stabalizes again before CR or PR. > >I believe that it would perhaps be advantageous to take the Test LC vote first >tomorrow - and just accept that some of the LC comments we've already had may >impact the next version of Test, just like they may impact the next version >of the other docs. > >If there is a test case (for owl:Class rdfs:Class) proposed I can add it >before a last call vote, or take an action to add it before lc publication, >but if we are still in the thinking stage, I would be disappointed if that >were to hold up a test LC. > >Jeremy I agree w/Jeremy, don't want to hold up LC. What I do need to know is if we need to reopen the issue - could someone please answer -JH -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-731-3822 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 17:15:55 UTC