- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:55:50 -0400
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
amp;In-Reply-To=<20030509.161403.35615391.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>&References=<20030509.161403.35615391.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>Content-Type: text/plain Organization: World Wide Web Consortium (http://www.w3.org/) Message-Id: <1054313775.21361.279.camel@dirk.dm93.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 30 May 2003 11:56:15 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK, yes, peter, please send this. To elaborate, in case my mailer isn't giving enough threading clues... In response to this comment... OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments Jan Grant (Fri, May 09 2003) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0050.html Peter proposed this reply... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0112.html And Jim OK'd it, with one minor correction. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0128.html I read 0112 and I concur; it's responsive to the comment and consistent with the WG proceedings; i.e. it doesn't involve any changes that merit a WG decision. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 12:55:57 UTC