Re: proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments''

amp;In-Reply-To=<>&References=<>Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium (
Message-Id: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 
Date: 30 May 2003 11:56:15 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

OK, yes, peter, please send this.

To elaborate, in case my mailer isn't giving enough
threading clues...

In response to this comment...

OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments
Jan Grant (Fri, May 09 2003)

Peter proposed this reply...

And Jim OK'd it, with one minor correction.

I read 0112 and I concur; it's responsive to the comment
and consistent with the WG proceedings; i.e. it doesn't
involve any changes that merit a WG decision.

Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 12:55:57 UTC