- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 13 May 2003 10:22:21 -0500
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 10:04, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] > > I'm happy to work on a better answer, but you don't suggest any text > > for the meat of his comments, > > I haven't found the decisions yet. The 12 Dec decision to close 5.23 included an action for Ian to elaborate on justification, which he did: Complexity and implementability of OWL languages From: Ian Horrocks (horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk) Date: Thu, Dec 19 2002 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Dec/0239.html I'll have a go at making the issues list more clear about our decision rationale so that we can just point Mr. Merry at that... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.23-hasValue-in-owl -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 11:24:19 UTC