The RDF Core group is discussing a late last call comment from a developer 
which proposes that triples of the form
_:x rdf:type rdf:List .
should not be produced by the
construct, but that it should only produce rdf:first and rdf:rest triples. 

I and Dave Beckett have opposed, on the grounds this construct was put in for 
OWL, (based on daml:collection) and this is what webont asked for.

Peter, at my invitation, has indicated he would oppose this change. [3]

However, RDF Core is deadlocked, so I have indicated that I am willing to 
shift my oppose to an abstain if I do not get strong support from WebOnt 
before the next RDF Core meeting (Friday 9th).



[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#timbl-03
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0586.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0273.html

Received on Friday, 2 May 2003 17:08:21 UTC