Re: SEM: OWL Full semantics

DanC:
> With my W3C process hat on, the different editor lists for
> different parts are just fancy-looking acknowledgements,
> not relevant to the constraint that
> "Every technical report on the Recommendation track is edited by one or
> more editors appointed by a Working Group Chair."
>  -- http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/tr

In a different group I have on one or two occassions disagreed with a 
co-editor and found that asking the WG to adjudicate was the most appropriate 
path.

Jeremy

Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 14:50:20 UTC