- From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 09:43:33 -0700
- To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Overview has been updated to put owl:Nothing in OWL Lite by doing the 2 points below along with adding an entry in the change log of the update. New version with May 1 update in the normal place - http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLOverview.htm Deborah Ian Horrocks wrote: >The changes required to the various documents in order to implement >this change seem to be very minor. As far as I can tell they would be >limited to: > > >Overview >======== > >In Section 3.1 "OWL Lite RDF Schema Features", under "Classes", append >the sentence "There is also a built-in most specific class named >Nothing that is the class that has no instances and a subclass of all >OWL classes.". > >In Section 4 "Incremental Language Description of OWL DL and OWL >FULL", under "complex classes", delete the sentence "OWL also includes >a special "bottom" class with the name Nothing that is the class that >has no instances.". > > >Guide >===== > >No change. > > >Reference >========= > >In Section 3.1 "Class descriptions", delete "NOTE: owl:Nothing is not >included in OWL Lite.". > >In Section 8.3 "OWL Lite", delete "owl:Nothing" from list of things >forbidden in Lite. > > >S&AS >==== > >In "Index of Vocabulary (Informative)", in the entry for >"owl:Nothing", add pointer to Section 2.1 in column labelled "Abstract >OWL Lite Syntax". > > >Editors of individual documents will no doubt want to double check to >see that I didn't miss anything. > >Regards, Ian > > >
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2003 12:43:48 UTC