www-style@w3.org from September 2005 by date

Friday, 30 September 2005

• Re: Simple template-based editing Bert Bos
• Re: Simple template-based editing Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Simple template-based editing Matthew Raymond
• Re: Simple template-based editing Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Simple template-based editing Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Simple template-based editing Daniel Glazman
• Re: Simple template-based editing Robin Berjon
• Re: Simple template-based editing Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Simple template-based editing Daniel Glazman
• Re: Simple template-based editing Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Simple template-based editing Orion Adrian
• Re: Simple template-based editing Robin Berjon
• Re: Simple template-based editing Robin Berjon
• Re: Simple template-based editing Robin Berjon
• Re: Simple template-based editing Matthew Raymond
• Re: Simple template-based editing Matthew Raymond
• Re: Simple template-based editing David Woolley
• Re: Simple template-based editing Daniel Glazman
• Re: Simple template-based editing Lachlan Hunt

Thursday, 29 September 2005

• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries Chris Lilley
• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries Ian Hickson
• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries Chris Lilley
• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries Ian Hickson
• Re: Simple template-based editing Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries Chris Lilley
• Re: Simple template-based editing Ian Hickson
• Re: Simple template-based editing Ian Hickson
• Re: Simple template-based editing Bert Bos
• Re: Simple template-based editing Bert Bos
• Re: Simple template-based editing Daniel Glazman
• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media: page box initial size Christian Roth
• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries Ian Hickson
• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media: page box initial size Ian Hickson
• Re: Simple template-based editing Ian Hickson
• Re: Simple template-based editing Bert Bos
• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media: page box initial size Christian Roth
• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media: page box initial size Anne van Kesteren
• [CSS21] Paged Media: page box initial size Christian Roth
• Re: Simple template-based editing Robin Berjon
• Re: Simple template-based editing Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Simple template-based editing Robert Koberg
• Simple template-based editing Bert Bos
• Test Suite for Media Queries Chris Lilley

Wednesday, 28 September 2005

• Re: [CSS21] please add "none" as a new value for the "content" property in appendix c: changes Spartanicus
• [CSS21] please add "none" as a new value for the "content" property in appendix c: changes Spartanicus
• What 'Advanced Layout' suggestions have been proposed? Jacob Floyd

Tuesday, 27 September 2005

• Re: (X)HTML + CSS + SMIL and alternative style sheets. Anne van Kesteren
• (X)HTML + CSS + SMIL and alternative style sheets. Matthew Raymond

Monday, 26 September 2005

• Re: [CSS2][css3-text] Text-Shadow: computed value Ian Hickson

Sunday, 25 September 2005

• Re: [CSS2][css3-text] Text-Shadow: computed value Christian Biesinger
• Re: [CSS2][css3-text] Text-Shadow: computed value L. David Baron
• [CSS2][css3-text] Text-Shadow: computed value Christian Biesinger

Friday, 23 September 2005

• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Bert Bos
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? White Lynx
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Malcolm Rowe
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Rijk van Geijtenbeek
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Laurens Holst
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? White Lynx

Thursday, 22 September 2005

• Re: [css3-text] Text shadow issues Christian Biesinger
• Re: XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) Bert Bos
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Bert Bos
• Re: css3 absolute positioning and containing blocks question/suggestion Jacob Floyd

Wednesday, 21 September 2005

• RE: CSS vs tables for layout Larry Israel
• RE: CSS vs tables for layout Mark Moore
• Re: CSS vs tables for layout David Woolley
• Re: [css3-text] Text shadow issues Ian Hickson
• Re: CSS vs tables for layout Boris Zbarsky
• RE: CSS vs tables for layout Joseph McBride
• [css3-text] Text shadow issues Christian Biesinger
• Re: [css21] anonymous block boxes versus block boxes Anne van Kesteren
• Re: css3 absolute positioning and containing blocks question/suggestion Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: css3 absolute positioning and containing blocks question/suggestion Jacob Floyd

Tuesday, 20 September 2005

• css3 absolute positioning and containing blocks question/suggestion Jacob Floyd
• Re: CSS vs tables for layout Lynn Alford
• Re: CSS vs tables for layout Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media Allan Sandfeld Jensen
• CSS vs tables for layout Joseph McBride
• Re: [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property Daniel Yacob

Monday, 19 September 2005

• Re: background-color 'transparent' not right valid with any color? Jan Brasna
• background-color 'transparent' not right valid with any color? Chiaki
• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media David Woolley
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Patrick Lauke
• Re: [CSS2.1] Replaced elements Staffan Måhlén
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Gavin Kistner
• Re: [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property Daniel Glazman
• Re: [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property Bert Bos
• [CSS21] Paged Media Allan Sandfeld Jensen
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? White Lynx
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? White Lynx
• RE: [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property Richard Ishida
• Re: XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) David Woolley
• RE: XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) David Pratten
• Re: XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) Lachlan Hunt
• XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) David Pratten

Sunday, 18 September 2005

• CSS fallback: sensitive elements versus unsenstive ones Orion Adrian
• Re: Defining Browser Compatibility Without Relying on the Browser Richard York
• Re: Defining Browser Compatibility Without Relying on the Browser Rob Mientjes
• Re: Defining Browser Compatibility Without Relying on the Browser Richard York
• Defining Browser Compatibility Without Relying on the Browser Richard York
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? David Woolley
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Emrah BASKAYA

Saturday, 17 September 2005

• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] David Woolley
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? David Woolley
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Matthew Raymond
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS Malcolm Rowe
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 16 September 2005

• [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property Daniel Yacob
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Gregory Tomlinson
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Gregory Tomlinson
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Bert Bos
• Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS Chris Lilley
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS Malcolm Rowe
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS Chris Lilley
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Daniel Glazman
• RE: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Patrick Lauke
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Rijk van Geijtenbeek
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Larry Israel
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS Robin Berjon
• Re: [CSS2.1] Replaced elements Bert Bos
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Ian Hickson

Thursday, 15 September 2005

• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Laurens Holst
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] David Woolley
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] David Woolley
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS Bert Bos
• Re[2]: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Ron van den Boogaard
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Daniel Glazman
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: block-based parsing? Richard York
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS Chris Lilley
• Re: [CSS2.1] Replaced elements Staffan Måhlén
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Laurens Holst
• Re: [CSS21] Shrink-to-fit Staffan Måhlén
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Daniel Glazman
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian

Wednesday, 14 September 2005

• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Laurens Holst
• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right Laurens Holst
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] David Woolley
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies Orion Adrian
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right Malcolm Rowe
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right Malcolm Rowe
• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Kornel Lesinski
• Bottom aligned page in CSS - How? Mateusz Pohl
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Ian Hickson
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies Kornel Lesinski
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies Ian Hickson
• Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] Orion Adrian
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies Anne van Kesteren
• Block-based parsing; allow lies Kornel Lesinski
• Re: block-based parsing? Emrah BASKAYA

Tuesday, 13 September 2005

• Re: block-based parsing? David Woolley

Wednesday, 14 September 2005

• Re: block-based parsing? Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 13 September 2005

• Re: block-based parsing? Daniel Glazman
• Re: block-based parsing? Emrah BASKAYA
• Re: block-based parsing? Jan Brasna
• Re: block-based parsing? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: block-based parsing? Kris Vanderwater
• Re: block-based parsing? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [CSS2.1] Replaced elements Bert Bos
• Re: block-based parsing? Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: block-based parsing? Eric A. Meyer
• Re: block-based parsing? Orion Adrian
• Re: block-based parsing? Philip TAYLOR
• Re: block-based parsing? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: block-based parsing? Orion Adrian
• block-based parsing? Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

Monday, 12 September 2005

• Re: [CSS 2.1] graphic representing the table box Bert Bos

Sunday, 11 September 2005

• Re: [CSS21] Shrink-to-fit L. David Baron

Saturday, 10 September 2005

• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? Orion Adrian
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? White Lynx
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? White Lynx
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? David Woolley
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? David Woolley
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? White Lynx
• [CSS 2.1] graphic representing the table box Philippe Wittenbergh

Friday, 9 September 2005

• Re: [OT] page layouts David Woolley
• Re: page layouts Bruno Melloni
• Re: page layouts Kris Vanderwater
• Re: page layouts Bruno Melloni
• Re: page layouts Kris Vanderwater
• Re: page layouts Allan Sandfeld Jensen
• page layouts Bruno Melloni
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? Jonathan Chetwynd

Thursday, 8 September 2005

• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? David Woolley
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? Orion Adrian
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? Orion Adrian
• Are href and src part of CSS? Jonathan Chetwynd

Wednesday, 7 September 2005

• RE: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Michael Cooper
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Matthew Raymond

Tuesday, 6 September 2005

• Re: 'locking' symbols with text Larry Israel
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: 100% height and DIV overflow Bruno Melloni
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Daniel Glazman
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Bert Bos
• Re: 'locking' symbols with text Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Daniel Glazman
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Robin Berjon
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Boris Zbarsky
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Ian Hickson
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Boris Zbarsky
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Boris Zbarsky
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Boris Zbarsky

Monday, 5 September 2005

• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Boris Zbarsky
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Daniel Glazman
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Chris Lilley
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Chris Lilley
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Orion Adrian
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Chris Lilley

Sunday, 4 September 2005

• Re: [css21] Tables section comments Jens Meiert
• Re: [css21] Tables section comments Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Matthew Raymond

Saturday, 3 September 2005

• CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors Patrick H. Lauke

Friday, 2 September 2005

• Re: [OT] 'locking' symbols with text David Woolley
• Re: 100% height and DIV overflow David Woolley
• Re: [CSS21] Shrink-to-fit Staffan Måhlén
• Re: Svar: Re: Request for specific changes to CSS3-UI Allan Beaufour
• 100% height and DIV overflow Bruno Melloni
• Re: 'locking' symbols with text Bert Bos
• 'locking' symbols with text Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Svar: Re: Request for specific changes to CSS3-UI Daniel Glazman

Thursday, 1 September 2005

• Svar: Re: Request for specific changes to CSS3-UI Allan Beaufour
• Re: [CSS21] as-rendered properties Al Gilman

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2005 22:54:43 UTC