www-style@w3.org from September 2005 by author

Al Gilman

• Re: [CSS21] as-rendered properties (Thursday, 1 September)

Allan Beaufour

• Re: Svar: Re: Request for specific changes to CSS3-UI (Friday, 2 September)
• Svar: Re: Request for specific changes to CSS3-UI (Thursday, 1 September)

Allan Sandfeld Jensen

• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media (Tuesday, 20 September)
• [CSS21] Paged Media (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: page layouts (Friday, 9 September)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media: page box initial size (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: (X)HTML + CSS + SMIL and alternative style sheets. (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: [css21] anonymous block boxes versus block boxes (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: [css21] Tables section comments (Sunday, 4 September)

Bert Bos

• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Replaced elements (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Replaced elements (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: [CSS 2.1] graphic representing the table box (Monday, 12 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: 'locking' symbols with text (Friday, 2 September)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: CSS vs tables for layout (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: CSS vs tables for layout (Tuesday, 20 September)
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Monday, 5 September)

Bruno Melloni

• Re: page layouts (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: page layouts (Friday, 9 September)
• page layouts (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: 100% height and DIV overflow (Tuesday, 6 September)
• 100% height and DIV overflow (Friday, 2 September)

Chiaki

• background-color 'transparent' not right valid with any color? (Monday, 19 September)

Chris Lilley

• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries (Thursday, 29 September)
• Test Suite for Media Queries (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS (Friday, 16 September)
• [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Monday, 5 September)

Christian Biesinger

• Re: [CSS2][css3-text] Text-Shadow: computed value (Sunday, 25 September)
• [CSS2][css3-text] Text-Shadow: computed value (Sunday, 25 September)
• Re: [css3-text] Text shadow issues (Thursday, 22 September)
• [css3-text] Text shadow issues (Wednesday, 21 September)

Christian Roth

• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media: page box initial size (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media: page box initial size (Thursday, 29 September)
• [CSS21] Paged Media: page box initial size (Thursday, 29 September)

Daniel Glazman

• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Svar: Re: Request for specific changes to CSS3-UI (Friday, 2 September)

Daniel Yacob

• Re: [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property (Tuesday, 20 September)
• [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property (Friday, 16 September)

David Pratten

• RE: XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) (Monday, 19 September)
• XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) (Monday, 19 September)

David Woolley

• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: CSS vs tables for layout (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Sunday, 18 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Saturday, 10 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Saturday, 10 September)
• Re: [OT] page layouts (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: [OT] 'locking' symbols with text (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: 100% height and DIV overflow (Friday, 2 September)

Dimitri Glazkov

• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

• block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)

Emrah BASKAYA

• Re: css3 absolute positioning and containing blocks question/suggestion (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Sunday, 18 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)

Eric A. Meyer

• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)

Gavin Kistner

• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Monday, 19 September)

Gregory Tomlinson

• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Test Suite for Media Queries (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Paged Media: page box initial size (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: [CSS2][css3-text] Text-Shadow: computed value (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: [css3-text] Text shadow issues (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)

Jacob Floyd

• What 'Advanced Layout' suggestions have been proposed? (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: css3 absolute positioning and containing blocks question/suggestion (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: css3 absolute positioning and containing blocks question/suggestion (Wednesday, 21 September)
• css3 absolute positioning and containing blocks question/suggestion (Tuesday, 20 September)

Jan Brasna

• Re: background-color 'transparent' not right valid with any color? (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)

Jens Meiert

• Re: [css21] Tables section comments (Sunday, 4 September)

Jonathan Chetwynd

• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Saturday, 17 September)
• Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Thursday, 8 September)
• Are href and src part of CSS? (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: 'locking' symbols with text (Tuesday, 6 September)
• 'locking' symbols with text (Friday, 2 September)

Joseph McBride

• RE: CSS vs tables for layout (Wednesday, 21 September)
• CSS vs tables for layout (Tuesday, 20 September)

Kornel Lesinski

• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Block-based parsing; allow lies (Wednesday, 14 September)

Kris Vanderwater

• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: page layouts (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: page layouts (Friday, 9 September)

L. David Baron

• Re: [CSS2][css3-text] Text-Shadow: computed value (Sunday, 25 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Shrink-to-fit (Sunday, 11 September)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: XHTML+CSS single-source (multi-channel) (Monday, 19 September)

Larry Israel

• RE: CSS vs tables for layout (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: 'locking' symbols with text (Tuesday, 6 September)

Laurens Holst

• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right (Wednesday, 14 September)

Lynn Alford

• Re: CSS vs tables for layout (Tuesday, 20 September)

Malcolm Rowe

• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right (Wednesday, 14 September)

Mark Moore

• RE: CSS vs tables for layout (Wednesday, 21 September)

Mateusz Pohl

• Bottom aligned page in CSS - How? (Wednesday, 14 September)

Matthew Raymond

• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• (X)HTML + CSS + SMIL and alternative style sheets. (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Sunday, 4 September)

Michael Cooper

• RE: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Wednesday, 7 September)

Mikko Rantalainen

• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get [block based parsing] right (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)

Orion Adrian

• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• CSS fallback: sensitive elements versus unsenstive ones (Sunday, 18 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Block-based parsing; allow lies (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Saturday, 10 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Monday, 5 September)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Saturday, 10 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Monday, 5 September)
• CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Saturday, 3 September)

Patrick Lauke

• RE: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Monday, 19 September)
• RE: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)

Philip TAYLOR

• Re: block-based parsing? (Tuesday, 13 September)

Philippe Wittenbergh

• [CSS 2.1] graphic representing the table box (Saturday, 10 September)

Richard Ishida

• RE: [CSS3 Text] word-space-symbol Property (Monday, 19 September)

Richard York

• Re: Defining Browser Compatibility Without Relying on the Browser (Sunday, 18 September)
• Re: Defining Browser Compatibility Without Relying on the Browser (Sunday, 18 September)
• Defining Browser Compatibility Without Relying on the Browser (Sunday, 18 September)
• Re: block-based parsing? (Thursday, 15 September)

Rijk van Geijtenbeek

• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Friday, 16 September)

Rob Mientjes

• Re: Defining Browser Compatibility Without Relying on the Browser (Sunday, 18 September)

Robert Koberg

• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Simple template-based editing (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Grammar precludes future XML syntax for CSS (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: CSS 3 color module and deprecation of "system" colors (Tuesday, 6 September)

Ron van den Boogaard

• Re[2]: Browsers will never get it right [was Re:Blocked-base parsing?] (Thursday, 15 September)

Spartanicus

• Re: [CSS21] please add "none" as a new value for the "content" property in appendix c: changes (Wednesday, 28 September)
• [CSS21] please add "none" as a new value for the "content" property in appendix c: changes (Wednesday, 28 September)

Staffan Måhlén

• Re: [CSS2.1] Replaced elements (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Replaced elements (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Shrink-to-fit (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: [CSS21] Shrink-to-fit (Friday, 2 September)

White Lynx

• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Are there W3C definitions of presentation and content? (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Saturday, 10 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Saturday, 10 September)
• Re: Are href and src part of CSS? (Saturday, 10 September)

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2005 22:54:43 UTC