- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 01:23:40 +0200
- To: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-www-style@farside.org.uk>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Malcolm Rowe schreef:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:03:51PM +0300, Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
>
>> Sure, @required wouldn't fix all the issues in the world, not even
>> all the issues we have when we combine CSS and HTML, but it does
>> give us (style authors) a few more tools to fight the UA bugs.
>>
>
> Can @required be implemented in such a way that it is useful with
> browsers that don't understand it, or do we have to wait until all
> CSS-capable browsers implement @required before we start using it?
>
> Because it seems to me that a naïve implementation (or design), i.e.:
>
> @required {
> color: black;
> background: white;
> }
>
> would actually result in none of the rules being applied in today's
> UA's. Or am I mistaken?
>
And we’re back to my point at:
http://www.grauw.nl/articles/css-faq.php#how-long
^_^
~Grauw
--
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 23:23:45 UTC