- From: Ron van den Boogaard <ron@ronvdb.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:19:44 +0200
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:14:24 +0200 Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote/schreef: > >Laurens Holst wrote: > >>>> Let's also study why lame VHS killed superior Betamax, ok? >>> >>> I'm fairly positive it has something to do with VHS holding 6 hours >>> and Betamax only holding 2. Though I could be wrong. Superiority is >>> determined by the market. >> >> No, it had to do with the fact that Philips did not allow porn to be >> released for the Betamax. > >More seriously: no, superiority is NOT determined by the market. Success is. >Betamax was superior to VHS and still is. > >So I think your original "we'll see that client side CSS and Javascript isn't a >good solution" is just pure nonsense - and deep utopia. (yes, I perfectly got >the context of that quote) > So basically the question is: "Can CSS3.0 handle all the requirements of the porn-industry?" -- Ron van den Boogaard <ron@ronvdb.com> http://www.ronvdb.com blog: http://tangogarden.blogspot.com
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 17:20:06 UTC