- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:36:56 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
White Lynx wrote: > Consider it like you wish, but there is clear requirement in CSS community and two different rendering engines already implemented linking extensions. Before CSS was well supported by browsers, there was also a clear requirement from the web design community to build complex layouts, and they started using tables and all sorts of markup trickery to get visual effects, and browsers implemented all manner of funky proprietary tags and attributes to do even more visual stuff in HTML. That does not mean, however, that it's the right thing to do, IMHO. (X)HTML is for content, CSS is for presentation. Wouldn't the generation of links be more of an XSLT issue? -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2005 11:36:58 UTC