Thursday, 30 September 2010
- Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
- Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
- Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
- Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
- Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
- URI strings in literals
- Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
- Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
- RDFa Meeting minutes...
- RDFa API more feedback
- Re: (late) agenda for meeting, 2010-09-30
- (late) agenda for meeting, 2010-09-30
Tuesday, 28 September 2010
- Re: empty prefix value
- Re: empty prefix value
- Re: empty prefix value
- Re: empty prefix value
- Re: empty prefix value
- Re: empty prefix value
- empty prefix value
- RDFa API base & uri resolution
Friday, 24 September 2010
Thursday, 23 September 2010
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-09-23
- Comment on the RDFa API working draft
- Re: Telecon Agenda - September 23th 2010, 1400 UTC
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
Wednesday, 22 September 2010
- Re: Ranging Properties
- Re: Ranging Properties (was: Re: Musing on URI references vs. URI-s as string)
- Ranging Properties (was: Re: Musing on URI references vs. URI-s as string)
- Re: Musing on URI references vs. URI-s as string
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
Sunday, 19 September 2010
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
Monday, 20 September 2010
Sunday, 19 September 2010
- Re: RDFa API proposed changes & IDL
- Re: RDFa API proposed changes & IDL
- RDFa API proposed changes & IDL
- Re: RDFa API implementation feedback
- More notes on DataStore
- RDFa API implementation feedback
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
Saturday, 18 September 2010
Friday, 17 September 2010
Thursday, 16 September 2010
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-09-16
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: @profile
- Re: @profile
Wednesday, 15 September 2010
- @profile
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Telecon Agenda - September 16th 2010, 1400 UTC
- Re: Absorbing Microdata
- Absorbing Microdata
Tuesday, 14 September 2010
- Telecon Agenda - September 16th 2010, 1400 UTC
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
- RDFa API Heartbeat Candidate 2 - 2010-09-13
- Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
Monday, 13 September 2010
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
- Re: RDFa API Heartbeat Candidate 1 - 2010-09-12
- Re: RDFa API Heartbeat Candidate 1 - 2010-09-12
- RDFa API Heartbeat Candidate 1 - 2010-09-12
- Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
Friday, 10 September 2010
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
Thursday, 9 September 2010
- Re: Small @profile question
- Re: Small @profile question
- Small @profile question
- Meeting minutes, 2010-09-09
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Class diagrams for the RDFa API
- Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: RDF JS API (aka RDFa API)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
- Re: Fwd: RDF JS API (aka RDFa API)
- Fwd: RDF JS API (aka RDFa API)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Telecon Agenda - September 9th 2010, 1400 UTC
Monday, 6 September 2010
- Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-34: meta-name triple generation
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-36: default vocab specification
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-34: meta-name triple generation
- Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-12: Benji's wishlist
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
Sunday, 5 September 2010
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-42: DOMString vs. string
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-36: default vocab specification
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-34: meta-name triple generation
- New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
- property hooks for RDFa API
Saturday, 4 September 2010
- DataStore.forEach
- Re: RDFa API: ondata="javascript: foo();" attribute for <body> element?
- rdf-rdfa and rdf_context update to RDFa Core 1.1 2010-08-03
- Re: RDFa API: ondata="javascript: foo();" attribute for <body> element?
- Re: RDFa API: ondata="javascript: foo();" attribute for <body> element?
- RDFa API: ondata="javascript: foo();" attribute for <body> element?
Friday, 3 September 2010
Thursday, 2 September 2010
- Closing issues that may have consensus
- Proposal to close ISSUE-12: Benji's wishlist
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-11: default prefix declarations
- Re: Telecon Agenda - September 2nd 2010, 1400 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - September 2nd 2010, 1400 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - September 2nd 2010, 1400 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - September 2nd 2010, 1400 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - September 2nd 2010, 1400 UTC