Re: RDFa 1.1 Primer

Hi Ben,

Looking good!

I'll think about it a bit more, but it's now such a simple
introduction that I think the RDF graphs feel a little out of place.
Even if the graphs should stay, I'm wondering whether the term 'blank
node' couldn't be dropped?

Anyway...just pondering...but excellent work -- it's definitely
getting simpler and simpler.

Regards,

Mark

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> It's been a while, but I think my distance helped me write a new draft of
> the Primer somewhat effectively. At least, I hope!
>
> Here it is:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-primer/
>
> Some tweaks to diagrams and references are needed, but I think now's the
> right time for feedback from the group.
>
> I realize that some in the group want to do away completely with @xmlns in
> the Primer. I tried that in an early draft, but I could never reconcile it
> with Facebook's current markup recommendation, which is probably the way
> that most users will be introduced to RDFa.... so bear with me on that
> approach long enough to read through the whole thing and tell me what you
> think!
>
> -Ben
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2010 11:16:15 UTC