- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:17:58 +0100
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:21:14 +0100 Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Perhaps that's a question I should ask then, if an (X)HTML+RDFa 1.1 > document contains CURIE-s that cannot be resolved, ... This is a situation which I don't think can arise. A CURIE-like token that doesn't correspond to an existing CURIE prefix is taken to be a URI. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 20:18:38 UTC