- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:08:47 +0200
- To: Sebastian Heath <sebastian.heath@gmail.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <7F1067E7-D0D7-42F8-9FEC-34B262189955@w3.org>
Sebastian, On Sep 15, 2010, at 05:52 , Sebastian Heath wrote: > Manu, > > Thanks for picking this up on twiiter. The question was somewhat > inspired by not wanting to put both microdata and rdfa in a document. > And it also occurred to me that the RDFa 1.1 profile mechanism could > play role. > > If there is a profile, it similarly defines the processing of itemtype > and itemprop. That's a small(?) extension of the model you describe. > This is not a small extension at all. What you propose would mean to introduce a mechanism whereby one could dynamically add new attributes to the core RDFa processing. Ie, modify the processing rules of RDFa run-time. I must admit I would be pretty much opposed to do that in the current round of RDFa; it is just way too complex for my taste right now. > But I like the separate document for defining how to interpret > microdata as RDFa. An '-i microdata' flag for RDFa parsers. > Yes, as I said in my other mail, if there was a microdata->RDFa mapping, that could work and would be good. So, no good deed goes unpunished: do you think you know somebody who could/would write such a document? :-) Cheers Ivan > All in the spirit of "just throwing it out there". > > -Sebastian > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >> Here's an interesting idea from Sebastian Heath via Twitter: >> >>> sebastianheath: Has anybody thought about merging rdfa and microdata > >> via @itemprop? So that itemprop/property are interchangeable. #rdfa >>> #microdata >> >> It's interesting because I can almost see an alternative document that >> tells RDFa processors how to interpret Microdata markup via the RDFa >> Processing rules. Note that this would be a document that is completely >> external to RDFa Core, XHTML+RDFa, and HTML+RDFa. >> >> The preliminary updates to the processing rules in an external document >> that would allow this to happen are below. Here is the translation table >> from Microdata to RDFa: >> >> Microdata RDFa >> --------- ---- >> itemscope typeof="" >> itemref about="#ITEMREF_VALUE" or about="FULL_URI" >> itemtype typeof="ITEMTYPE_VALUE" (OVERRIDES itemscope) >> itemprop property="FULL_URI" or property="MODDED_ITEMPROP_VAL" >> >> where MODDED_ITEMPROP_VAL is "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#" + >> attribute value of itemprop. >> >> There are still problems with nesting itemprops/itemscopes and the types >> that Microdata has specified for vcard, vevent and work... don't know if >> anybody else has looked at this yet. Just throwing it out there. >> >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) >> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: Saving Journalism - The PaySwarm Developer API >> http://digitalbazaar.com/2010/09/12/payswarm-api/ >> >> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 15 September 2010 09:06:02 UTC