candidate CR version of Semantics
implementation reports
N-Triples/N-Quads/TriG/Semantics earl reports
editing fix to Semantics
RDF/JSON
message to RDF entailment implementors
potential RDF entailment systems
RDF 1.1 CR transition
Static version of Concept's CR spec ready
RDF-ISSUE-169: DOM4 dependency [RDF Concepts]
removing normative reference to HTML5
PROPOSED resolution of Turtle LC comment 36
PROPOSED resolution of Turtle LC comment 38
RDF-ISSUE-168: [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation]
agenda 30 Oct telecon [NOTE: for Europeans1 hour earlier]
No telecon this week
A comment on issue-148
what do we need for the CR meeting?
Fwd: Transition Request: JSON-LD to Proposed Recommendation
Fwd: Transition Request: RDF 1.1 Concepts, Semantics, TriG, N-Triples & N-Quads to Candidate Recommendation
Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313
- Re: Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313
- Re: Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313
RDF-ISSUE-167 (stronger dataset semantics): Stronger semantics of RDF Datasets? [RDF Semantics]
JSON-LD PR Transition Request ready / ACTION-314
Unable to make changes using Mercurial
- RE: Unable to make changes using Mercurial
- New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial)
- New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial)
edits made for Turtle CR
comments re issue-166
Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)
Re: Datatype Maps, was Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics
JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-22
telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation
- Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation
- RE: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation
- Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation
- RE: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation
- Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation
- Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation
- Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation
- Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation
RDF-ISSUE-166: LC Comment: Michael Schneider - non-urgent issues [RDF Semantics]
RDF-ISSUE-165 (datatype map): LC Comment: datatype map [RDF Semantics]
RDF-ISSUE-164 (@reverse bug): Pierre-Antoine Champin: @reverse algorithm is counter-intuitive [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation]
RDF-ISSUE-163 (@type overloading): Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation]
RDF-ISSUE-162 (OData/JSON-LD Convergence): Attempt to converge markup mechanisms for OData and JSON-LD [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation]
Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics
Fwd: Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)
Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013
- RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013
- Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013
almost-CR version of Semantics
Made JSON-LD API non-normative
RDF-ISSUE-161: CR/CR Comment: Michael Schneider [RDF Concepts]
Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax
- Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax
- Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax
Micheal Schneider's Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax
fixed up test case rdfs-entailment-2
RDFS-inconsistency of a strange RDF graph
Steps to Move Concepts to CR
JSON-LD PR request
RDF 1.1 CR request
Fwd: Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)
RDF-ISSUE-160: N-Triples LC WD typos [RDF N-Triples]
Fwd: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)
Previous Editors in ReSpec Docs? (RDF WG ISSUE-150)
Fwd: Daylight Saving Time (DST) change reminder; 27-Oct to 3-Nov
JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-15
Upcoming Publishing Moratoria
agenda 16 Oct telecon
Response to ISSUE-159
Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)
Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151)
Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 15th 2013
Proposed response to ISSUE-159
- Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159
- Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159
- changes proposed in Semantics for ISSUE-159 (was Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159)
RDF-ISSUE-159 (interpretations): RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing [RDF Semantics]
treatment of -comments messages
running test suites
Minutes for 09 Oct 2013
ack Brian McBride as previous series editor in Semantics ISSUE-150
status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses
ISSUE-158: Davidwood to make an editorial change to concepts in answer to action-147
ISSUE-157: Davidwood to make an editorial change to concepts in answer to issue-147
ISSUE-156: Media type parameter for turtle
ISSUE-155: Media type parameter for turtle
ISSUE-154: Media type parameter for turtle
RDF-ISSUE-153: Ryan Laboucane: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation]
JSON-LD blocked to PR by RDF Concepts
JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-08
agenda 9 Oct telecon
RDF-ISSUE-152: CR comment: reified statements in Turtle [RDF Turtle]
RDF-ISSUE-151: LC comment: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 [RDF Concepts]
Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 8th 2013
Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38
ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection
- Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection
- Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection
Fwd: [Moderator Action] RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations
advice on appropriate responses to comments
Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF"
RE: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF"
RE: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
Fwd: Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents
Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents
RDF-ISSUE-150: LC Comment: references and acknowledgements [RDF Concepts]
response to Jeremy on ISSUE-144
readme and license for entailment tests
Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful
- Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful
- Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful
Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations
- Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations
- Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations
a question about turtle as it appears in the test manifests
JSON-LD CR Implementers: Update to test suite
Minutes for 2013-10-02
Proposed Dataset negative entailment test
[Turtle CR Issue] PREFIX with postfix parameter
RDF-ISSUE-149: LC comment: Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations [RDF Semantics]
RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts]
RDF-ISSUE-147: Definition of "Generalized RDF" [RDF Concepts]
RDF-ISSUE-146: procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics [RDF Concepts]
RDF-ISSUE-145: Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful [RDF Semantics]
browser warnings on WG documents
generalized RDF comment from David Booth
Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics]