W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2013

Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:02:48 -0400
To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20131023150242.GC7819@w3.org>
* Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> [2013-10-22 12:00+0200]
> All,
> There is a draft agenda for tomorrow's telecon:
>   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.10.23
> The agenda gives suggestions for how to handle the open issues for
> Concepts, Semantics and the three syntax docs. Please
> comment/edit/add/...

I'd like to see if we can get a quick WG decision to resolve the
versioning comment with no action. I drafted (but didn't particularly
endorse) a proposal for a media type parameter to label different
versions of Turtle.

The only respones was from Andy who gave it a -1 (just after seeing the issue):

PROPOSE: the Working Group considered adding versioning to Turtle but is not persuaded that it will do more good than harm (including delays).

Another decision that would make it easier to respond to a commenter is the response on a syntax for reification, ending in this text
with these amendments from Ivan:

PROPOSE: the Working Group considered adding a reification syntax to Turtle b ut opted against in light of the use of named graphs and Trig.

> I'm still missing a draft PR request for JSON-LD. Hopefully we will
> be able to discuss/decide that as well.
> Please assume the telecon will be for 75 min, with a possibility to
> extend with 15 min.
> Guus


office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +

Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 15:03:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:33 UTC