- From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:54:59 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
RDF-ISSUE-168: [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation]
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/168
Raised by: Markus Lanthaler
On product: JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation
Raised by Matt Wuerstl:
------%<-------------------
In section 6.16 Data Indexing of the latest JSON-LD spec an example of data indexing is given that is confusing. In Example 54, the term "post" is defined as:
"post": {
"@id": "schema:blogPost",
"@container": "@index"
}
And then the subsequent descriptive text refers to the "blogPost" term:
In the example above, the blogPost term<http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#dfn-term> has been marked as an index map<http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#dfn-index-map>. The en, de, and ja keys will be ignored semantically, but preserved syntactically, by the JSON-LD Processor. This allows a developer to access the German version of the blogPost using the following code snippet: obj.blogPost.de.
Shouldn't this text be referencing the "post" term as it was defined in the context? And referenced in code as org.post.de?
Thanks for the clarification.
Regards,
Matt
------%<-------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Oct/0097.html
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 12:55:04 UTC