- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 16:21:46 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 02/10/13 13:25, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > We have two issues going back to Feb with people requesting whitespace > before '.' and ';', i.e. > > <s> <p> <o> . # good > <s> <p> <o>. # bad > <s> <p> <o> ; <p2> <o2> . # good > <s> <p> <o>; <p2> <o2> . # bad > > We discussed the grammar at length but this never came up. Proposal: > answer comments 1 and 2 with "The RDF Working Group believes that > introducing a requirement for whitespace before '.' and ';' will break > a considerable fraction of the deployed Turtle and introduce > unfortunate incompatibilities with SPARQL and Notation3." Note that > commentor 1 is responding to lookahead required when implementing a > parser without a separate greedy lexer and commenter 2 is backing up 1 > with a usability argument. > > Comments: <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#Issues> > comment 1: http://www.w3.org/mid/1361141033.16176.30.camel@verne.drobilla.net > comment 2: http://www.w3.org/mid/1361211939.4549.115.camel@dbooth-w530 > Agreed - many traditional Turtle and existing data would break (inc Freebase) SPARQL compatibility is weakened. We had a trailing dot on prefix names there as well. It is actually a very big change - we'd need to change the whitespace rules, as the grammar part does not mention WS; essentially adding WS into the rules part. Andy
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 15:22:19 UTC