Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF"

There are lots of reasons to not move the section to Semantics.  Yours is
adequate by itself.

A response is being generated by Pat and Antoine with new wording for the
paragraph, but rejecting the move, and not changing the definitions in any
way.

peter


On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Markus Lanthaler
<markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 02, 2013 4:35 AM, David Booth wrote:
> > Regarding section 7
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130723/#section-
> > generalized-rdf
> >
> > It does not look like my comments about Generalized RDF were addressed:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-
> > comments/2013Aug/0008.html
> > [[
> > I think the most appropriate place for the definition of "generalized
> > RDF" would be in the RDF Semantics document, for two reasons: (a)
> > that's
> > where the notion is actually used (to simplify entailment rules); and
> > (b) that would give it less prominence and hence reduce the likelihood
> > that someone would think it is a form of standard RDF.
> > ]]
>
> JSON-LD links to that definition in Concepts. I don't think it would be a
> good idea to move it to Semantics.
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>