- From: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:20:05 -0700
- To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Cc: RDF Working Group <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMpDgVwdSDxkx00-HYwN=CSUf5+ivVqJZg1sJLGwhNAu2G1B0g@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, or at least in part. peter On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Antoine Zimmermann < antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr> wrote: > Le 02/10/2013 04:07, Peter Patel-Schneider a écrit : > > We now have a proposal from Jeremy on this issue. >> >> The guts of the proposal is carried in one simple but pernicious word: >> MAY. The proposal would allow RDF implementations to behave differently >> from each other on the same entailment regime. I view this as >> destroying the last bits of interoperability in RDF, and thus will be >> voting against it. >> >> On the other hand, producing a new entailment regime that embodies the >> difference in behaviour that Jeremy appears to want would fit right into >> the way that divergence currently works in RDF. I have no problem with >> the WG producing a WG note defining this entailment regime. I would >> even be enthusiastic towards this note (but not to the point of writing >> any part of it) if it defined several entailment regimes that differ in >> their treatment of named graphs. >> > > Isn't it exactly the purpose of the note I've written? This note > describes entailment regimes for RDF datasets that differ in their > treatment of named graphs. > > > AZ > > >> peter >> >> > > -- > Antoine Zimmermann > ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol > École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne > 158 cours Fauriel > 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 > France > Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 > Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 > http://zimmer.**aprilfoolsreview.com/<http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/> >
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 18:20:32 UTC