W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2013

Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:32:31 +0200
Message-ID: <52677B8F.3010709@vu.nl>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>


On 23-10-13 06:04, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> I am uneasy with POSTPONING ISSUE-142.  It is not as if the WG was
> unable to do anything with respect to this issue.  Instead the WG
> decided to do very, very, very little with respect to this issue.

That's the reason my proposal is to raise a new issue and postpone it.
The new issue should say that the WG has discussed various options for a 
stronger semantics of datasets, but was unable to do so, and pointing to 
the relevant threads/notes/issues.  In this way we archive where we left 
it, and thus make it easier for future groups to pick it up, if needed.

>
> I don't think that ISSUE-165 is suitable to be marked as AT-RISK. There
> are no observable behavioural differences in RDF systems dependent on
> this issue.

Agreed.  My suggestion would be to handle it at CR time, as it indeed 
does not affect tests.

>
> Handling editorial issues:  At some time, the WG needs to decide that
> adequate attention has been paid to an editorial issue.  I suggest that
> the WG officially close most of the long-open editorial issues, making
> only the changes that have been determined up to now.

Agreed; all or almost all can be closed.

Guus

>
> peter
>
>
>
> On 10/22/2013 06:00 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> There is a draft agenda for tomorrow's telecon:
>>
>>   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.10.23
>>
>> The agenda gives suggestions for how to handle the open issues for
>> Concepts, Semantics and the three syntax docs. Please
>> comment/edit/add/...
>>
>> I'm still missing a draft PR request for JSON-LD. Hopefully we will be
>> able to discuss/decide that as well.
>>
>> Please assume the telecon will be for 75 min, with a possibility to
>> extend with 15 min.
>>
>> Guus
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 07:32:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:33 UTC