W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2013

Re: rdf semantics test suite setup

From: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:30:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMpDgVzrO8RJgEN6udXBEE1q3=QdmsYUV_UEk5RN7COnbWpWnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>wrote:

> On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:09 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>
> > The 2004 test suite is described and enumerated here:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#testcases
> >
> > I've copied the tests themselves (the contents of the last test zipfile
> generated) to mercurial, at
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/default/rdf-mt/tests/2004-test-suite
>
> I created a script to generate a 2013-formatted manifest from the Positive
> and NegativeEntailmentTests in the 2004-test-suite and copy the referenced
> files into https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/default/rdf-mt/tests,
> including transforming those in RDF/XML format to Turtle.
> [...]
>
> I also did not copy test:entailmentRules or test:datatypeSupport, as they
> seem to be purely infomational. Again, we could mint new predicates in the
> mf: namespace and transform those as well.
>

These are not informational, but they do need to be updated to entailment
regimes instead of rule sets.   Different entailment regimes have different
results.

I'll add the entailment regime information (using a new property) and make
necessary changes.

peter
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:30:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:33 UTC