- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:23:28 -0400
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
The commenter noted that
[[
@prefix : <http://example.org/stuff/1.0/> .
(1 [:p :q] ( 2 ) ) .
]]
is not valid turtle as collection appears in
[10] subject ::= iri | BlankNode | collection
and not as an alternative subject in
[6] triples ::= subject predicateObjectList | blankNodePropertyList predicateObjectList?
(e.g. | (blankNodePropertyList | collection) predicateObjectList?
PROPOSED: change the example to be
[[
@prefix : <http://example.org/stuff/1.0/> .
(1 [:p :q] ( 2 ) ) :p2 :q2 .
]]
and respond to the commenter with
Dear Alex,
On 15 May, in
<http://www.w3.org/mid/CABp3FN+1vHREjpgeEW1MyoTPA-O+nVstWJWjkP+4Ee6s5BcixA@mail.gmail.com>
, you noted that example 7 was not valid Turtle. We have updated the
example to be
[[
@prefix : <http://example.org/stuff/1.0/> .
(1 [:p :q] ( 2 ) ) :p2 :q2 .
]]
in the editor's draft, which will next be published as a Proposed
Recommendation. Does this address your comments. If no, please
indicate what would satisfy your comment. If yes, please reply with
the Subject: prefixed by "[RESOLVED]".
--
-ericP
office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.
There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 14:24:03 UTC