W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2013

RDF-ISSUE-151: LC comment: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 [RDF Concepts]

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:28:14 +0000
Message-Id: <E1VTXKg-0000JF-3B@stuart.w3.org>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
RDF-ISSUE-151: LC comment: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 [RDF Concepts]

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/151

Raised by: Guus Schreiber
On product: RDF Concepts

Comment by Jeremy Carroll:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Jul/0022.html

This is a formal comment on RDF Concepts 1.1

I am concerned that the resolution of issue 38 leaves a disconnect.

In particular, I think it is common practice to have datasets


<g1>  {

    <g1> rdf:type owl:Ontology
}


<g2> {


    <g2> rdf:type owl:Ontology ;
          owl:imports <g1> .
}


and this practice is somewhat undermined by the resolution of issue-38 which leaves a disconnect (^sd:name sd:graph) between the name and the graph.
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2013 13:28:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:17 UTC