- From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 21:46:18 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
RDF-ISSUE-144: Minor normative error in LC drafts [RDF Semantics] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/144 Raised by: Guus Schreiber On product: RDF Semantics Comment by Jeremy Carroll: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Oct/0000.html In concepts we read: [[ An RDF dataset is a collection of RDF graphs, and comprises: • Exactly one default graph, being an RDF graph. The default graph does not have a name and may be empty. • Zero or more named graphs. Each named graph is a pair consisting of an IRI or a blank node (the graph name), and an RDF graph. Graph names are unique within an RDF dataset. ]] In semantics we read: [[ An RDF dataset (see [RDF11-CONCEPTS]) is a finite set of RDF graphs each paired with an IRI or blank node called the graph name, ]] These are different. In particular. Concepts allows: <eg:a> {} <eg:b> {} And semantics does not, since the empty graph is not paired with a single IRI or blank node.
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 21:46:19 UTC