Fwd: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Your comments on RDF Concepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, 
ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148,  ISSUE-159)
Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:54:57 +0000
Resent-From: <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:54:28 +0200
From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>

Hi David,

Thanks again for taking the time to review our specs and sending comments.

Given the timeline of the WG we would like to move forward, if possible.
We would be obliged if you could indicate whether you can live with the
responses we sent you w.r.t   the following four issues:

   ISSUE-145 (https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/145):

   ISSUE-147 (https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/147):

   ISSUE-148 (https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/148):

   ISSUE-159 (https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/159):

It is not our intention to hasten you, but it would really be helpful if
you can send a reply before next Tuesday.

Thanks a lot in advance for considering this,

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 17:03:16 UTC