W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2013

Fwd: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159)

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:02:48 +0200
Message-ID: <525EC6B8.4020701@vu.nl>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Your comments on RDF Concepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, 
ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148,  ISSUE-159)
Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:54:57 +0000
Resent-From: <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:54:28 +0200
From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>

Hi David,

Thanks again for taking the time to review our specs and sending comments.

Given the timeline of the WG we would like to move forward, if possible.
We would be obliged if you could indicate whether you can live with the
responses we sent you w.r.t   the following four issues:

   ISSUE-145 (https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/145):

   ISSUE-147 (https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/147):

   ISSUE-148 (https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/148):

   ISSUE-159 (https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/159):

It is not our intention to hasten you, but it would really be helpful if
you can send a reply before next Tuesday.

Thanks a lot in advance for considering this,
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 17:03:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:33 UTC