- From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:02:22 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
RDF-ISSUE-163 (@type overloading): Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/163 Raised by: Manu Sporny On product: JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation This issue was originally raised by Adrian Pohl and Simon Grant: To me (and possibly others) it would be helpful either (a) to put a note in section 5.4 in any case -- not talking about type coercion, but simply noting that @type arrays cannot be used within @context (you don't have to say why at that point), or (b) to dis-overload (?) @type, so that within @context there is "@valuetype" or something, with @type reserved for nodes outside the context. Thread starts here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-linked-json/2013Aug/0033.html Comment above is from this email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-linked-json/2013Oct/0016.html
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 08:02:27 UTC