W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2013

RDF-ISSUE-163 (@type overloading): Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation]

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:02:22 +0000
Message-Id: <E1VYWv0-0000ab-LD@stuart.w3.org>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
RDF-ISSUE-163 (@type overloading): Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation]

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/163

Raised by: Manu Sporny
On product: JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation

This issue was originally raised by Adrian Pohl and Simon Grant:

To me (and possibly others) it would be helpful either
(a) to put a note in section 5.4 in any case -- not talking about type coercion, but simply noting that @type arrays cannot be used within @context (you don't have to say why at that point), or
(b) to dis-overload (?) @type, so that within @context there is "@valuetype" or something, with @type reserved for nodes outside the context.

Thread starts here:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-linked-json/2013Aug/0033.html

Comment above is from this email:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-linked-json/2013Oct/0016.html
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 08:02:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:17 UTC