- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:29:33 -0400
- To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, 'RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I don't see that "at risk" is appropriate here. The change does not have any consequences on the behaviour of RDF systems, it is just a different way of taking a non-formal part of how RDF works and making it more formal. peter On 10/22/2013 02:41 AM, Michael Schneider wrote: > Hi Sandro! > > Just this one for now (I have to leave to work :-)): I agree that putting > this "At Risk" for the moment seems to be a good idea. I'll then have some > time to check myself the technical consequences, if any. For now, I don't > see it as a purely editorial change, since fundamental terminology used in > the old RDF Semantics and several other core Semantic Web standards is being > removed/replaced. > > Best, > Michael
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 20:30:05 UTC