- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:39:04 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 02/10/13 16:21, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 02/10/13 13:25, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: >> We have two issues going back to Feb with people requesting whitespace >> before '.' and ';', i.e. >> >> <s> <p> <o> . # good >> <s> <p> <o>. # bad >> <s> <p> <o> ; <p2> <o2> . # good >> <s> <p> <o>; <p2> <o2> . # bad >> >> We discussed the grammar at length but this never came up. Proposal: >> answer comments 1 and 2 with "The RDF Working Group believes that >> introducing a requirement for whitespace before '.' and ';' will break >> a considerable fraction of the deployed Turtle and introduce >> unfortunate incompatibilities with SPARQL and Notation3." Note that >> commentor 1 is responding to lookahead required when implementing a >> parser without a separate greedy lexer and commenter 2 is backing up 1 >> with a usability argument. >> >> Comments: >> <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#Issues> >> >> comment 1: >> http://www.w3.org/mid/1361141033.16176.30.camel@verne.drobilla.net >> comment 2: http://www.w3.org/mid/1361211939.4549.115.camel@dbooth-w530 >> > > Agreed - many traditional Turtle and existing data would break (inc > Freebase) > > SPARQL compatibility is weakened. We had a trailing dot on prefix names > there as well. Missing word: "We had a trailing dot on prefix names *discussion* there as well." > It is actually a very big change - we'd need to change the whitespace > rules, as the grammar part does not mention WS; essentially adding WS > into the rules part. > > Andy
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 16:39:38 UTC