Thursday, 11 June 2009
Wednesday, 3 June 2009
Thursday, 4 June 2009
- Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
- Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
Wednesday, 3 June 2009
- Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
- Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
- Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
- Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
- Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
- PlainLiteral spec, ruby, bidi, etc.
- Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
- Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
- adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
- ACTION-340 completed (align the spec with the changes to rdf:PlainLiteral)
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: "do not occur"
- RE: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- RE: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- [RESOLVED] Re: SPARQL WG comments on rdf:text
- Re: built-in naming in rdf:PlainLiteral
- RE: "do not occur"
- Re: built-in naming in rdf:PlainLiteral
Tuesday, 2 June 2009
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- Re: "do not occur"
- "do not occur"
- string-from-PlainLiteral vs string-from-plain-literal
- Re: the i18n paragraph
- RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- built-in naming in rdf:PlainLiteral
- Re: the i18n paragraph
Monday, 1 June 2009
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
- the i18n paragraph
Sunday, 31 May 2009
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
Friday, 29 May 2009
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- I18N review, rdf:text --> rdf:PlainLiteral
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: minutes of Wednesday's telecon
- what is Option 5?
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- minutes of Wednesday's telecon
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: first para
Thursday, 28 May 2009
- Re: first para
- first para
- Re: name of the datatype
- Re: name of the datatype
- name of the datatype
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document
- new version of rdf:O)-> document
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- RE: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
Wednesday, 27 May 2009
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: answers to questions about rdf:text?
- Re: answers to questions about rdf:text?
- Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- answers to questions about rdf:text?
- proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5
- Re: 'in the result of'
- Re: 'in the result of'
- Re: 'in the result of'
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: regrets and last input for the call...
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- RE: rdf-text telecon agenda
- RE: regrets and last input for the call...
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: rdf:text draft
Tuesday, 26 May 2009
- Re: rdf:text draft
- Re: rdf-text telecon agenda
- rdf-text telecon agenda
- Re: regrets and last input for the call...
- regrets and last input for the call...
- name change
- Re: 'in the result of'
- Re: Poll to find time to discuss rdf:text
- RE: 'in the result of'
- 'in the result of'
Sunday, 24 May 2009
Saturday, 23 May 2009
Friday, 22 May 2009
- Re: enforcing the prohibition
- Re: enforcing the prohibition
- Re: enforcing the prohibition
- RE: enforcing the prohibition
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: Pat's draft
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: Pat's draft
- Re: simple fix
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Pat's draft
- Re: simple fix
- enforcing the prohibition
- Re: simple fix
- Re: simple fix
- Re: simple fix
- Re: simple fix
- Re: simple fix
Thursday, 21 May 2009
- Re: simple fix
- Re: simple fix
- Re: simple fix
- A counter proposal for changes to the rdf:text document
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: simple fix
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: simple fix
- cross posting about rdf:text
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: simple fix
- simple fix
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A modest note on rdf:text from the an OWLer
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A modest note on rdf:text from the an OWLer
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A modest note on rdf:text from the an OWLer
- Re: A modest note on rdf:text from the an OWLer
- preventing the spread of rdf:text
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- A modest note on rdf:text from the an OWLer
Wednesday, 20 May 2009
- Poll to find time to discuss rdf:text
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- history lesson RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
Tuesday, 19 May 2009
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
Monday, 18 May 2009
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
Saturday, 16 May 2009
- A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
- Re: SPARQL-WG comment on rdf:text
Friday, 15 May 2009
Wednesday, 6 May 2009
- Re: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- RE: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- RE: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- RE: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Wednesday, 22 April 2009
- Re: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text
- Re: Minor comments on rdf:text
- formal comment on rdf:text from "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen"
Wednesday, 15 April 2009
- Re: RIF resolved to publish rdf:text as LC
- Re: RIF resolved to publish rdf:text as LC
- XML Schema datatypes 1.0 vs. 1.1
- RIF resolved to publish rdf:text as LC
Tuesday, 14 April 2009
Sunday, 12 April 2009
Wednesday, 8 April 2009
- [Fwd: error in http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions???]
- Re: comments on rdf:text draft
- RE: comments on rdf:text draft
- Re: comments on rdf:text draft
- RE: comments on rdf:text draft
- Re: Last thing before LC
- Re: comments on rdf:text draft
- Re: Last thing before LC
Tuesday, 7 April 2009
- RE: comments on rdf:text draft
- RE: comments on rdf:text draft
- Last thing before LC (was: Re: a few more editorial comments)
- RE: a few more editorial comments
- comments on rdf:text draft
- a few more editorial comments
- Re: rdf:text ready for LC?
- rdf:text ready for LC?
- Re: editoral comments on rdf:text
- Re: text "MUST replace in the graph"
- RE: editoral comments on rdf:text
- RE: editoral comments on rdf:text
- Re: editoral comments on rdf:text
- RE: editoral comments on rdf:text
- editoral comments on rdf:text
- Re: text "MUST replace in the graph"
Monday, 6 April 2009
- Re: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document
- Re: text "MUST replace in the graph"
- Re: text, lowercase language tags
- Re: text, lowercase language tags
- Re: text, lowercase language tags
- Re: text, lowercase language tags
- RE: text "MUST replace in the graph"
- Re: text "MUST replace in the graph"
- RE: text, lowercase language tags
- Re: text, lowercase language tags
- RE: text "MUST replace in the graph"
- RE: text, lowercase language tags
- rdf:text "MUST replace in the graph"
- rdf:text, lowercase language tags
- RE: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document
- Re: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document
- RE: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document
- Re: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document
- RE: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document
- Re: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document
- RE: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document
- Re: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document
- I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document
- RE: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes
- Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes
- Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes
Sunday, 5 April 2009
- Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes
- Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes
- Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes
- Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes