deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week

Do you think SPARQL-WG can confirm this week that the current text of
rdf:PlainLiteral

    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PlainLiteral

is satisfactory?  The introduction and section 4, as well as the title
and abstract have been entirely re-written in response to your LC
comment.  The new text is less than a page, though, and should be easy
to review.  My sense from discussions on the public-rdf-text mailing
list is that the current text is *probably* acceptable to everyone
(while not yet perfect, I'm sure).

If it's not approved this week, it probably means a lot more work for
several people (like me), since it will probably get out of sync with
the other OWL documents.  (Depending on the scheduling of the transition
meeting, which is not yet determined, it might be possible to slip one
more week and not get out of sync.)

     -- Sandro

Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 01:27:46 UTC