rdf:text ready for LC?

Dear all,

Boris and I had several iterations over the remaining Editorial Notes.
We have resolved all we could, the thing remaining is that we marked both

   rtfn:compare

and

   rtfn:length

as AT RISK.

If that is ok for LC (we think that the current definiton of the both 
functions is water-proof, but we could still remove it if there were 
serious objections) then the spec [1] is ready for last call in our opinion.

Axel & Boris

1. http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec

p.s.: seems that the W3C wikis are not accessible at the moment
-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, 
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 13:47:12 UTC