- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:10:50 -0400
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- cc: "public-rdf-text@w3.org" <public-rdf-text@w3.org>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009May/0009
>
> The issue about the results of FILTER functions, all algebra operators
> and how to pass constraints into a matching as some engines might (and
> do).
>
> Just saying "results" does not work. That only applies to what comes
> out in SPARQL results.
>
> We have three layers:
>
> 1 - Results formats (SPARQL XML Results or RDF graphs)
> 2 - Algebra and FILTER functions
> 3 - BGP matching.
>
> And also the query syntax (4).
>
> The text only covers (1) and (4). Change the matching and the correct
> behaviour at level 2 is undefined.
It sounds like the solution is to extend the wording about syntaxes to
also cover interfaces between software sub-systems, and then perhaps
give one of these as an example. Would that do it?
-- Sandro
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 15:10:56 UTC