- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:38:22 +0100
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: public-rdf-text@w3.org, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
I implemented the namespace and function name changes.
In the course of that, I removed the two editor's notes
{{EdNote|[[User:SandroHawke|SandroHawke]]|These functions have not yet
been renamed. The word "text" in the function names may change to
"plain-literal", and the namespace may change from
.../rdf-text-functions to .../plain-literal-functions}}
{{EdNote|[[User:SandroHawke|SandroHawke]] 13:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)|In
previous drafts of this specification and the RIF and OWL 2
specifications, this datatype was called "rdf:text". The name was
changed to emphasize the correspondence between this datatype and RDF
plain literals. The syntactic form of the name parallels rdf:XMLLiteral.}}
We need to register the plfn: namespace, right?
Axel
Axel Polleres wrote:
> Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec
>>> now has my edits with the changes from Pat/Jonathan?
>>> and the extra sentence from Andy.
>>> All edits have descriptions in the history page so you can see how the
>>> document has evolved.
>>> Please take a look and see if you like it, taking into account the
>>> continuing discussion on how exactly to best handle SPARQL.
>>>
>>> Note that there might be some places where the formatting needs to be
>>> fixed up, as I copied in ASCII text, not HTML text.
>>
>> Nice work. I fixed a couple typos and several remants of the rdf:text
>> name. I also added an editor's note about the renaming, which I think
>> we should keep for the next TR.
>>
>> (Honestly, don't throw rocks, but I'm having second thoughts about the
>> renaming. It's just... long. And we have to figure out whether to
>> rename all the builtins and the namespace for the builtins now, too. I
>> guess we should wait for Axel to be back next week before going farther
>> with that.)
>
> sorry for only answering late...
>
> 1) obviously, I think the built-should be renamed just by replacing
>
> s/text/PlainLiteral/ plus we should also rename the namespace and prefix
> from
>
> i.e.
>
> namespace/prefix:
> "plfn stands for the http://www.w3.org/2009/rdf-PlainLiteral-functions
> namespace."
>
> accordingly, I suggest to change the built-in names:
>
> plfn:PlainLiteral-from-string
>
> plfn:string-from-PlainLiteral
>
> plfn:lang-from-PlainLiteral
>
> plfn:compare
>
> plfn:length
>
> plfn:matches-language-range
>
>
> as for the issue of the datatype-name/funciton-names "being long"... as
> long as there are datatypes such as "yearMonthDuration" I wouldn't
> bother too much, frankly.
>
> best,
> Axel (still following up, I hope I didn't miss any later mails
> invalidating this answer....)
>
--
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 08:39:02 UTC