- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:38:22 +0100
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: public-rdf-text@w3.org, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
I implemented the namespace and function name changes. In the course of that, I removed the two editor's notes {{EdNote|[[User:SandroHawke|SandroHawke]]|These functions have not yet been renamed. The word "text" in the function names may change to "plain-literal", and the namespace may change from .../rdf-text-functions to .../plain-literal-functions}} {{EdNote|[[User:SandroHawke|SandroHawke]] 13:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)|In previous drafts of this specification and the RIF and OWL 2 specifications, this datatype was called "rdf:text". The name was changed to emphasize the correspondence between this datatype and RDF plain literals. The syntactic form of the name parallels rdf:XMLLiteral.}} We need to register the plfn: namespace, right? Axel Axel Polleres wrote: > Sandro Hawke wrote: >>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec >>> now has my edits with the changes from Pat/Jonathan? >>> and the extra sentence from Andy. >>> All edits have descriptions in the history page so you can see how the >>> document has evolved. >>> Please take a look and see if you like it, taking into account the >>> continuing discussion on how exactly to best handle SPARQL. >>> >>> Note that there might be some places where the formatting needs to be >>> fixed up, as I copied in ASCII text, not HTML text. >> >> Nice work. I fixed a couple typos and several remants of the rdf:text >> name. I also added an editor's note about the renaming, which I think >> we should keep for the next TR. >> >> (Honestly, don't throw rocks, but I'm having second thoughts about the >> renaming. It's just... long. And we have to figure out whether to >> rename all the builtins and the namespace for the builtins now, too. I >> guess we should wait for Axel to be back next week before going farther >> with that.) > > sorry for only answering late... > > 1) obviously, I think the built-should be renamed just by replacing > > s/text/PlainLiteral/ plus we should also rename the namespace and prefix > from > > i.e. > > namespace/prefix: > "plfn stands for the http://www.w3.org/2009/rdf-PlainLiteral-functions > namespace." > > accordingly, I suggest to change the built-in names: > > plfn:PlainLiteral-from-string > > plfn:string-from-PlainLiteral > > plfn:lang-from-PlainLiteral > > plfn:compare > > plfn:length > > plfn:matches-language-range > > > as for the issue of the datatype-name/funciton-names "being long"... as > long as there are datatypes such as "yearMonthDuration" I wouldn't > bother too much, frankly. > > best, > Axel (still following up, I hope I didn't miss any later mails > invalidating this answer....) > -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 08:39:02 UTC