- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:28:30 +0200
- To: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
- CC: RIF WG Chairs <team-rif-chairs@w3.org>, OWL WG Chairs <team-owl-chairs@w3.org>, Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "public-rdf-text@w3.org" <public-rdf-text@w3.org>
Hi, this is mainly a question to the RIF/OWL chairs: We never formally replied to Andy's comments, probably because there is no single formal WG in charge for rdf:text. How shall we proceed on that? Axel Jie Bao wrote: > Dear Andy Seaborne. > > Thank you for your response. I incorporated them in the wiki-version > of the rdf:text document. The version is at > * http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=InternationalizedStringSpec&oldid=18720 > > The diff to the original document is: > * http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=InternationalizedStringSpec&diff=18720&oldid=17905 > > I further made a few changes (details are given in the email) at > * http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=InternationalizedStringSpec&oldid=18758 > > Those changes can be tracked at > * http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=InternationalizedStringSpec&action=history > > Please note this email only reflects my personal opinion. It’s not a > formal working group response. > > Please let me know whether or not you are satisfied with this response > to your comment. I’m glad to have further discussions about any > remaining issues. > > Regards > > Jie -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 13:32:25 UTC