public-rdf-text@w3.org from April to June 2009 by author

Alan Ruttenberg

Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Monday, 1 June)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: 'in the result of' (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: 'in the result of' (Tuesday, 26 May)
Re: Poll to find time to discuss rdf:text (Tuesday, 26 May)
Poll to find time to discuss rdf:text (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Tuesday, 19 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Tuesday, 19 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)
Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes (Sunday, 5 April)

Axel Polleres

Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: built-in naming in rdf:PlainLiteral (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Tuesday, 2 June)
built-in naming in rdf:PlainLiteral (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Tuesday, 26 May)
regrets and last input for the call... (Tuesday, 26 May)
Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (Saturday, 23 May)
Re: enforcing the prohibition (Saturday, 23 May)
Re: enforcing the prohibition (Friday, 22 May)
Re: simple fix (Friday, 22 May)
Re: simple fix (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Tuesday, 19 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)
Re: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: Minor comments on rdf:text (Wednesday, 22 April)
XML Schema datatypes 1.0 vs. 1.1 (Wednesday, 15 April)
[Fwd: error in http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions???] (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: comments on rdf:text draft (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: comments on rdf:text draft (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: Last thing before LC (Wednesday, 8 April)
Last thing before LC (was: Re: a few more editorial comments) (Tuesday, 7 April)
rdf:text ready for LC? (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: editoral comments on rdf:text (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: text "MUST replace in the graph" (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document (Monday, 6 April)
Re: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document (Monday, 6 April)
Re: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document (Monday, 6 April)
Re: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document (Monday, 6 April)
Re: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document (Monday, 6 April)
Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes (Monday, 6 April)
Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes (Sunday, 5 April)
changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes (Friday, 3 April)
Re: getting to Last Call on rdf:text (Friday, 3 April)

Boris Motik

ACTION-340 completed (align the spec with the changes to rdf:PlainLiteral) (Wednesday, 3 June)
RE: simple fix (Thursday, 21 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Tuesday, 19 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)
A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Saturday, 16 May)
RE: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 6 May)
RE: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 6 May)
[LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 6 May)
RE: review rdf:text (Tuesday, 14 April)
RE: comments on rdf:text draft (Wednesday, 8 April)
RE: comments on rdf:text draft (Wednesday, 8 April)
RE: comments on rdf:text draft (Tuesday, 7 April)
RE: a few more editorial comments (Tuesday, 7 April)
RE: editoral comments on rdf:text (Tuesday, 7 April)
RE: editoral comments on rdf:text (Tuesday, 7 April)
RE: text "MUST replace in the graph" (Monday, 6 April)
RE: text, lowercase language tags (Monday, 6 April)
RE: text "MUST replace in the graph" (Monday, 6 April)
RE: text, lowercase language tags (Monday, 6 April)
RE: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document (Monday, 6 April)
RE: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document (Monday, 6 April)
RE: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document (Monday, 6 April)
RE: I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document (Monday, 6 April)
I made an editorial pass over Section 5 of the document (Monday, 6 April)
RE: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes (Monday, 6 April)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

PlainLiteral spec, ruby, bidi, etc. (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 6 May)

C.M.Sperberg-McQueen

Re: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 6 May)

Chris Welty

RIF resolved to publish rdf:text as LC (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: Last thing before LC (Wednesday, 8 April)

Dave Reynolds

Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: comments on rdf:text draft (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: text "MUST replace in the graph" (Monday, 6 April)
Re: text, lowercase language tags (Monday, 6 April)
Re: text, lowercase language tags (Monday, 6 April)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

[RESOLVED] Re: SPARQL WG comments on rdf:text (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (Sunday, 24 May)
Re: enforcing the prohibition (Friday, 22 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Friday, 22 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Tuesday, 19 May)

Harry Halpin

Ian Horrocks

Re: RIF resolved to publish rdf:text as LC (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes (Monday, 6 April)

Ivan Herman

Re: RIF resolved to publish rdf:text as LC (Wednesday, 15 April)

Jeremy Carroll

Jie Bao

Re: the i18n paragraph (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: 'in the result of' (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)

Jonathan Rees

Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Thursday, 4 June)
Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Wednesday, 3 June)
adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: built-in naming in rdf:PlainLiteral (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Monday, 1 June)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Sunday, 31 May)
Re: name of the datatype (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: SPARQL-WG comment on rdf:text (Friday, 15 May)

Jos de Bruijn

review rdf:text (Sunday, 12 April)

Lee Feigenbaum

Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)

Pat Hayes

Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Monday, 1 June)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: name of the datatype (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: answers to questions about rdf:text? (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: 'in the result of' (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: regrets and last input for the call... (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf:text draft (Tuesday, 26 May)
Re: regrets and last input for the call... (Tuesday, 26 May)
Re: enforcing the prohibition (Friday, 22 May)
Re: Pat's draft (Friday, 22 May)
Re: Pat's draft (Friday, 22 May)
Re: simple fix (Friday, 22 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Friday, 22 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Friday, 22 May)
Re: simple fix (Friday, 22 May)
Re: simple fix (Friday, 22 May)
Re: simple fix (Friday, 22 May)
Re: simple fix (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: simple fix (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: A modest note on rdf:text from the an OWLer (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: A modest note on rdf:text from the an OWLer (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Wednesday, 20 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
preventing the spread of rdf:text (Thursday, 21 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)

Peter F.Patel-Schneider

Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Thursday, 4 June)
Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: "do not occur" (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Monday, 1 June)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Sunday, 31 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Sunday, 31 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: minutes of Wednesday's telecon (Friday, 29 May)
what is Option 5? (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: first para (Thursday, 28 May)
new version of rdf:O)-> document (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: answers to questions about rdf:text? (Wednesday, 27 May)
answers to questions about rdf:text? (Wednesday, 27 May)
proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: simple fix (Thursday, 21 May)
A counter proposal for changes to the rdf:text document (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: simple fix (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: A modest note on rdf:text from the an OWLer (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: A modest note on rdf:text from the an OWLer (Thursday, 21 May)
A modest note on rdf:text from the an OWLer (Thursday, 21 May)

Phillips, Addison

RE: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 6 May)
RE: comments on rdf:text draft (Tuesday, 7 April)
comments on rdf:text draft (Tuesday, 7 April)
RE: editoral comments on rdf:text (Tuesday, 7 April)
RE: getting to Last Call on rdf:text (Friday, 3 April)

Sandro Hawke

the References section of rdf:PlainLiteral (Thursday, 11 June)
Re: adding PlainLiteral to the document at http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns (Wednesday, 3 June)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Wednesday, 3 June)
"do not occur" (Tuesday, 2 June)
string-from-PlainLiteral vs string-from-plain-literal (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: the i18n paragraph (Tuesday, 2 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
the i18n paragraph (Monday, 1 June)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Sunday, 31 May)
I18N review, rdf:text --> rdf:PlainLiteral (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
minutes of Wednesday's telecon (Friday, 29 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Friday, 29 May)
Re: first para (Friday, 29 May)
first para (Thursday, 28 May)
name of the datatype (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document (Thursday, 28 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
Re: rdf:text draft (Wednesday, 27 May)
rdf-text telecon agenda (Tuesday, 26 May)
name change (Tuesday, 26 May)
'in the result of' (Tuesday, 26 May)
rdf:PlainLiteral (Saturday, 23 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Friday, 22 May)
Pat's draft (Friday, 22 May)
enforcing the prohibition (Friday, 22 May)
Re: simple fix (Friday, 22 May)
Re: simple fix (Friday, 22 May)
cross posting about rdf:text (Thursday, 21 May)
simple fix (Thursday, 21 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)
Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)
Re: SPARQL-WG comment on rdf:text (Saturday, 16 May)
SPARQL-WG comment on rdf:text (Friday, 15 May)
Re: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 6 May)
Re: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 6 May)
Re: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 6 May)
formal comment on rdf:text from "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" (Wednesday, 22 April)
"Boris Motik": [Moderator Action] RE: review rdf:text (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: review rdf:text (Tuesday, 14 April)
a few more editorial comments (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: rdf:text ready for LC? (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: editoral comments on rdf:text (Tuesday, 7 April)
editoral comments on rdf:text (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: text "MUST replace in the graph" (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: text, lowercase language tags (Monday, 6 April)
Re: text, lowercase language tags (Monday, 6 April)
Re: text "MUST replace in the graph" (Monday, 6 April)
Re: text, lowercase language tags (Monday, 6 April)
rdf:text "MUST replace in the graph" (Monday, 6 April)
rdf:text, lowercase language tags (Monday, 6 April)
Re: changes on rdf:text on the remaining Ed notes (Sunday, 5 April)

Seaborne, Andy

RE: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
RE: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
RE: "do not occur" (Wednesday, 3 June)
RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Tuesday, 2 June)
RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week (Monday, 1 June)
RE: proposed changes to the rdf:text document for option 5 (Thursday, 28 May)
RE: rdf-text telecon agenda (Wednesday, 27 May)
RE: regrets and last input for the call... (Wednesday, 27 May)
RE: 'in the result of' (Tuesday, 26 May)
RE: enforcing the prohibition (Saturday, 23 May)
RE: enforcing the prohibition (Friday, 22 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Thursday, 21 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Tuesday, 19 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)
RE: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time? (Monday, 18 May)

Last message date: Thursday, 11 June 2009 15:35:38 UTC