- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:49:49 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, phayes@ihmc.us, der@hplb.hpl.hp.com, public-rdf-text@w3.org, "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> In descriptions of the value space of plan literals
>>> in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/ language tagged values are written using
>>> "<" an ">" to group the tuple. In this document we use "(" and ")". I'd
>>> suggest using the "<" and ">" delimiters for consistency.
>> done. I kept '(' ')' for facet pairs, but changed to ⟨ ⟩ for
>> value pairs.
>
> We had reports of problems with ⟨ and &rang. Can we just use "<"
> and ">" like rdf-mt ?
done.
BTW: I also changed this in RIF DTB.
Note that ⟨ ⟩ might also be used in other RIF docs, didn't check.
Axel
>>> We had discussed including a note explaining that while RDF cited RFC
>>> 3066 we interpreted that as really citing the latest version of the
>>> language tag spec, and since BCP 47 supersedes 3066, the possible values
>>> of language tags for both plain literal and rdf:PlainLiteral are the same.
>> Any suggestion where to put and how to word this?
>
> Yeah, I thought about that for a bit, and couldn't figure out a good
> place to put it. :-(
>
> -- Sandro
>
>
--
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 17:50:32 UTC