- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:16:16 -0400
- To: public-rdf-text@w3.org
A few more:
* in At Risk #3, I think you mean "rtfn:length" not "rdfn:compare"
* in At Risk #1, I don't quite understand what's at risk. Is it the choice
of namespaces? Do you mean:
"The selection of the rtfn
(http://www.w3.org/2009/rdf-text-functions) namespace
may change, based on feedback that these functions should
be merged into another namespace"
That seems kind of problematic, since it's not a binary choice.
What is it that you think might change? What might it change to?
* In the intro:
> Furthermore, typed rdf:text literals that are semantically
^^^^ remove
Great work, guys.
-- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:16:26 UTC